WARNING AGAINST FRAUD

UDT Mr. Donaldson and AAHT Ms. Deavers - attempt of fraud


Dear Associates,

This is a WARNING against offers for investment of funds, that put at risk investor’s funds, issued by

UDT - UNITED DEVELOPMENT TRUST LTD, Mr. Gordon K. Donaldson, President, P.O. BOX 201990 Durban North 4016 Kwazulu Natal, South Africa, tel/fax: +27 31 705 2636, e-mail: udtgkd@telkomsa.net, and its partner

AAHT - ANGEL ANNIE HUMANITARIAN TRUST, LLC, Linda S. Deavers, Trustee, Indianapolis, IN, USA, registered in the State of Delaware and with representative office located at 8906 EAST 96TH STREET # 226, Fishers, IN, 46038, USA, but working in Indianapolis, IN; Mr. Gene Heilman authorized signatory, tel. +1 608 833 5685.

Both of said companies affirm to be a Trader, they are not!! They are only BROKERS!!

As Brokers they ask to enter in Joint Venture with Investor so that the full amount of proceeds coming from an investment is paid to them, thereafter, when they pay, they pay to Investor only a part of the proceeds received and from that part they ask their commission; for them a very good investment indeed!

The reaction of UDT/AAHT to the present denounce has been a denigration of my name for the simple reason that I have put the fact bluntly, detecting and divulging their fraud.

A denounce had been sent to the Anti-Fraud Department of the FED in Washington DC – USA, and to the Internet Crime Complaint Center, an FBI - NWSC partnership, for further action.

Mrs. Linda S. Deavers is 8 (eight) times recorded with Indiana’s Authorities.

Their exclusive way to work, not subjected to criticism, is the following:

Firstly, they accept only documents with their own text that hides some tricks and no change or alteration is allowed; secondly, after given their acceptance to the investment, they send another three documents without hiding their project to use investor’s funds for their benefit only or to steal them: a Joint Venture Contract Agreement, an “Attestation” and verbiage of SWIFT MT760.

All documents must be notarized so that the issuer can say, if necessary, when the investor refuses to proceed with them due to the risk to lose his own funds deposited in his bank account, you are a perjurer and then you have to pay us a penalty and costs; it is already succeeded..

An investor sent to UDT the first set of documents as requested, in order to discover their job, but he refused to sign the second set of 3 “non-changeable” documents (J.V., Attestation and SWIFT MT799) and enter into the program; no contract was signed with UDT and AAHT for do not lose his funds.

Herein below I have attached, for your perusal and consideration, the salient parts of said documents that Investor rightly refused to sign.

J.V. AGREEMENT:
……………………….
3.1 ………………………. Payment will be maid direct to UDT as distributor and Pay Master, and/or secured and paid direct to each party’s designated account. In no event shall such payment be made any later than the 10th business day following the receipt of the initial payment, or as otherwise agreed in writing.
……………………..
4.2 This agreement may unilaterally be declared null and void by the Client subject to acceptance, approval and entry to a trade investment program, in the event he/she has not received a return on their Assets within Sixty (60) international banking days from the end of Thirty (30) days after the date of the deposit and/or blocking of their asset with or at the direction of the UDT, and shall return control of the Asset to the Client upon demand as set forth herein.
……………………

COMMENT: after about 100 (10+60+30) days from SWIFT confirmation and block of funds, UDT and AAHT reserve to them full right do not pay proceeds to investor, and this one is then free to cancel the investment A very good proposal indeed!!

ATTESTATION:
………………………
I further attest that I granted and assigned the absolute rights for the use of the cash deposit to Angel Annie Humanitarian Trust, LLC, Linda S. Deavers, Trustee, their assigns, banks and or associates for a period of one year and one month for project funding and placement of common interest, as the credit I receive from the group by this absolute assignment to, Angel Annie Humanitarian Trust, LLC, their associates, and financial institutions are granted an unrestricted use and or application of the cash deposit as they see fit with the understanding that the same funds will be returned (released) to me after one year and one month from the date of the assignment. by this right, Angel Annie Humanitarian Trust, LLC may assign, pledge, put a lien on and or encumber the said cash deposit without objections from me, my heirs, my trust or my company during the time contemplated in this transaction.
I further attest that Angel Annie Humanitarian Trust, LLC is the sole entity empowered to use, apply or pledge this asset to the benefit of our specified projects and to further our financial interests using these assets.
I hereby authorize Angel Annie Humanitarian Trust, LLC, their financial institutions and compliance officers to block or put a lien on the said assets using the following information of the custodial bank:
………………………………
COMMENT : When funds are assigned to a third party that has the absolute rights on their use, the ownership of funds is lost, when funds can be assigned, pledged, put a lien on and or encumbered, without objections from investor, funds are definitively lost; when funds are used as guarantee for granting a loan and that loan is not paid at maturity, investor’s fund will be used for repayment of loan. Not bad indeed as investment !!

SWIFT MT 799:
………………………
The said funds has been blocked and reserved in favor of and for the benefit of your client ANGEL ANNIE HUMANITARIAN TRUST, LLC, LINDA S. DEAVERS, TRUSTEE in reference to the transaction with the aforementioned account at CHASE BANK, Mail Code IN1-6017, 7491 N. SHADELAND AVENUE, INDIANAPOLIS, IN. 46250 for a period of one year and one month from the date of issue of this message for their full use and benefit at the description of client.
We also confirm that these funds letter has been issued with full bank responsibility and that this reserved funds letter is freely available to the named beneficiary herein client ANGEL ANNIE HUMANITARIAN TRUST, LLC, LINDA S. DEAVERS, TRUSTEE to obtain a credit for their use and or as they may deem fit.
……………………..
COMMENT : By this SWIFT investor would have definitively lost his funds because a bank, that would have granted a line of credit to AAHT, could claim them in the event that the line of credit would not have been reimbursed by AAHT as agreed.

A Cease and Desist Order was sent instead of the last three documents; in reply to the Cease and Desist Order, the following mail had been received from UDT:

WE PLACE YOU ON NOTICE AND TERMS.

This serves to remind you of your legal standing, position and binding commitments made and signed under Notary by you in the Trade Documents submitted to the United Development Trust 7 March 2006 to which you gave the following under taking.
1. We draw your attention to the ''IRREVOCABLE'' resolution appointing the UDT as Asset Managers, (irrevocable meaning unable to be revoked).
2. The Notarised Funds Ownership Declaration, drawing yet again your attention to, and we quote, '' I further declare, accept and contractually commit to all terms and conditions and to the furtherance of this ''IRREVOCABLE'' transaction, without undue interference, cancellation, cease and desist instructions or any disrupting factors, unquote. (irrevocable meaning unable to be revoked).
3. The Letter of Authorization to Verify and Authenticate, and we quote,''I agree to hold our funds ''IRREVOCABLY'' available for the PP program, (irrevocable meaning unable to be revoked).
4. Despite our letters being headed STRICTLY PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL AND NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION, you have also breached and violated that agreement as well as the NC ND Agreement by consulting with third parties not party to the agreement or transaction, when you gave your word to us that you would not bring such people into the transaction, more say all this inexperienced people you have had consultation with.
5. We accommodated your by altering the bank SWIFT verbiage in incorporating the instruction NON-TRANSFERABLE, so there was no excuse for not accepting the SWIFT.
It seem to us that you have not read or studied these legal binding documents sworn before and officer of the court. You are also under the false impression that a Cease and Desist letter makes this all go away, when the Ownership Declaration signed by you clearly indicates that you committed to a non-cancellation transaction.. We have taken legal advise from counsel on this and it seems you have a problem with the many ''IRREVOCABLE COMMITMENTS'' you made notarised and signed.
You were pre-advised of all that was required of you and well instructed on the requirements hence your willing signature, appointment and sworn notarisations.
It is therefore our intentions to engage legal representation in your district and to institute legal proceedings against you for recovery of our loses, costs and damages for breach and violation of the Trade Documents and legal binding commitments you made to the UDT and Trade Trust.
Your misrepresentation of these sworn commitments under notary is tantamount to fraud and will weigh heavily against you for reneging on your committed obligations, such documents are binding and not to be treated lightly.
YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED! ! !
Sincerely CC. UDT Attorneys
Gordon K. Donaldson AA Trust
Chairman & CEO Chase Bank
United Development Trust L. Deavers

Further mails threatening to take legal action were received from UDT / Mr. Donaldson, for the reimbursement of suffered damages, caused by the breach of a contract never signed by Investor!!

Any further comment is reserved to you; a whole documentation is available under request.

Best regards.

Attilio Traldi
a.traldi@email.it

March 2006

NOTE:

The reaction to the publication of this “warning” on several HYIP Forums has been a raving letter containing a lot of insults against me, that Mr. Donaldson (UDT & AAHT) sent to collaborators in order to discredit my name, due to my awkward disclosure of his non-clean activity.

The reason of said letter is the undoubted fact that my affirmations are true and I hit the target.

My sole fault is to fight against swindlers and to take care the assets of Investors against any kind of risk and fraud. I think that it is better to be insulted by a swindler instead to have an Investor claiming from me the funds lost for my fault.

Non English Post DELETED.